![]() TOD’s are often promoted as a means to revitalize urban and suburban centers, and as an alternative to the economically and environmentally unsustainable model of predominant ex-urban North American land-use planning and development. Otherwise, the equally broad term of TAD, or Transit-Adjacent Development, may be more appropriate. 2 However, true TOD’s need to have sufficient density and diversity of uses, be anchored by a mass transit station, and be predominantly accessible by pedestrians or cyclists. They are also referred to as Pedestrian Pockets, which have been described as “a simple cluster to housing, retail space and offices within a quarter-mile walking radius of a transit system.” 1 Even though these models may be most applicable to urban environments, they have also been applied in ex-urban and suburban settings. A TOD may be a single building, a group of buildings, or a multiple block district. ![]() Multiple-unit housing and mixed use projects that support the public investment in light rail and fixed route transit (bus) service because they preserve, enhance, or contribute to creating active pedestrian districts within walking distance of transit. For example, the metropolitan transit authority of Portland Oregon defines TOD’s as: ![]() There is no one definition for Transit Oriented Development (TOD), but it is commonly defined as compact mixed-use development planned around transit hubs and accessible to walkable neighborhoods. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |